Term Paper
Web logs, better known today as blogs, are among the fastest growing communication mediums of our time. It seems as if everyone is blogging; from preteens to political organizations, to pastors, to retirees and everyone in between, there is a place in the blogisphere for you if you have the patience and the technological means to access it. Fast-paced and easily accessible, blogging has become a way for people to read, write and comment on the thoughts of others across the globe with the click of a mouse. For the first time, we have a medium of communication void of human contact that allows us to react and respond instantly.
For the last three months I have been ‘blogged on,’ but I am more than ready to ‘blog off.’ In short, I have found most bloggers have too much time on their hands. They have read and commented on more blogs by noon than the average person could in a week, and for what? The hope that their posts may lead to linking and commenting on their own blog? That their rating may increase a quarter of a fraction? I have found much of the blogisphere to be an elite community of techies trying to out link or out design the next guy. Most of the blogs I have read lack real discussion, in spite of the obscene number of comments many of them boast. Bloggers only link and read other like-minded bloggers, which too often prevents any sort of realistic two-sided dialogue. Thus, despite wishful thinking on the part of many bloggers, the blogisphere in its current condition will never, in my opinion, be able to compete with mainstream media. Its freedom prevents it from ever becoming a viable source of true information. For me it is a frustrating arena, which requires more time and energy to weed through than is worth for the lack of return I receive. That said, in the spirit of the movie High Fidelity (a film the whole class seems to agree is worth quoting), I give you the top five reasons I hate the blogisphere.
5- Anonymity.
You can be anyone or anything on the blogisphere, thus so can everyone else. There are no background checks when you create a blog, no name verification, you only need internet access. You can name you blog whatever you want, you can choose to call yourself whatever you want and you can certainly write about whatever topics you want- none of which require any truth. This concept frightens me, not for my own risk but for that of others. You see, I do not read blogs for factual news, for serious information or specific facts, mainly because how am I to know if anything I read is true or correct? Just because a blogger claims to be a medical doctor does in no way mean he actually is one. He could be fourteen-year-old kid pretending to be Doogie Howser and I would not know, but that is my own skepticism, or my own intelligence depending on how you look at it.
I read blogs for entertainment, to see what is being discussed, even to spark the flow of ideas, for these purposes the blogisphere can be invaluable. However, am I amongst the minority? Are there are people out there who look to blogs as a solid information source? There most certainly are, and those are the people I worry about in this medium. A perfect example of the danger in finding information on the blogisphere recently occurred on Wikipedia – an online community blogged encyclopedia. Incorrect and accusatory information was posted about a former friend and administration member of President John F. Kennedy. This information remained posted on Wikipedia for several months, partly because no one with the correct information looked at it, and partly because Wikipedia does not require text citing to post. Like many others, I ‘wiki’ someone or something on occasion to clarify who or what about a specific person or thing, but I am fully aware Wikipedia is anything but the encyclopedia Britannica. There are plenty of blogs out there that look and claim to be legitimate news sources, when in reality what they are ‘reporting’ and commenting on is completely false, fabricated and/or biased. Worst of all, there is no real accountability in this medium, as few readers ever actually meet the bloggers behind their favorite blogs. The blogisphere, veiled in anonymity, allows people to say things they may never say otherwise, including all things false, hurtful and inappropriate, but then again- no one is forcing you to read it.
4- Language and terminology.
The Blogisphere has a language all its own. Words like blog and blogisphere don’t appear in spell check, while linking and commenting take on entirely new meanings in this realm. The vocabulary alone could take weeks to learn on your own, as there is no such thing as a blogging dictionary.
Let’s begin with ‘blog,’ which is the abbreviated form of the words ‘web’ and ‘log.’ “Blogisphere’ is the term commonly used to describe the medium of blogs as a whole, while establishing it as a separate entity from the rest of the internet. ‘Bloggers’ are people who read, write and comment on blogs. ‘Proto bloggers,’ the first real group of people to explore this medium, create and maintain blogs that resembled online, public journals - www.livejournal.com and www.myspace.com are excellent examples of proto blogging sites. ‘Megablogs,’ such as www.slashdot.com and www.dailykos.com , are large multi-user blogs that resemble communities. Most megablogs have set of rules or guidelines specific to their blog, with a fairly regular group of bloggers who post frequently about their common subject.
Beyond the technical terms used to describe this new medium, the blogisphere has birthed a number other words. To be ‘dooced’ it to be fired from one’s job because of one’s job, coined by proto blogger Heather Armstrong. A ‘wiki’ is a type of megablog where a community of people is working together toward a common goal or task. The most successful example of this to date is the Wikipedia, a site attempting to write an online encyclopedia from the information bloggers post on it. ‘Blogonomics’ is the art of making money on the blogisphere.
Yet confusion in the blogisphere occurs when common words take on new meanings. For example, linking to and commenting on blogs are more than what their definitions mean. Sure, linking one blog to another does join the two, and commenting on a blog is posting your own thoughts about a subject, however there is another way to define these terms. In the blogisphere, linking and commenting can increase your blogs rating or score. They become a means to determine how successful your blog is. Links lead to hits, hits often lead to comments and both lead to a better blog rating- the ultimate goal for any serious blogger.
3- Speed.
One of the greatest appeals of the blogisphere is its speed. For the first time, we are dealing with a medium that allows nearly instantaneous information sharing. You have a thought or an opinion and the amount of time it takes you to put your ideas on your blog for the world to read is only the amount of time it takes you to write it and click ‘post.’ You as the blogger are in the driver’s seat, there are no editors, proof readers or panels to grant you their seal of approval. With literally one click of the mouse your work is available to be read by any and all interested. There is no arguing the speed of the blogisphere is hugely appealing, but on the flip side, this asset can also be extremely dangerous, and rather obnoxious.
In The Fat Woman’s Joke, British novelist Fay Weldon wrote, “One has to be careful with words. Words turn probabilities into facts, and by sheer force of definition translate tendencies into habits.” To me, this should be the surgeon’s general warning to bloggers and blog-readers alike. Between the mere structure of this medium and the speed in which it changes, words can quickly become weapons of mass destruction and /or a powerful advantage. There are no official fact-checkers on the internet, thus you can write whatever you want how ever you choose to, which can be a fabulous way to blow the whistle on story being ignored by the mainstream media, or a quick fix to a sticky situation. However, it seems too often on blogs that people react instantly to posts they read, and often this instant commentary is more heated name calling than intelligent disagreement. And with a total lack human contact, it is far more likely for a reader to misunderstand a post, taking it completely out of context or missing the sarcastic undertone. All the while, the speed of the blogisphere lends itself to posting and reposting, comment after comment after comment appears, and in a blink of an eye a vicious verbal war can erupt on a blog. It is the speed of this medium that allows both blogger and reader/commenter instant gratification, thus often turning normal individuals into blogging fanatics.
2- The Minions.
Blogging minions may be a creation of those of us taking the ‘Blogging On’ course at
Most blogs have a small or sometimes large community of readers faithful to the site, who usually agree with the point of view of the blogger. It is this tight knit virtual community of strangers that can and will become extremely hostile very quickly. Because they are so familiar with their blog or blogs of choice, their intense monitoring makes it easy for them to notice new visitors to the blog. It is important to keep in mind that true minions are fanatical about their favorite blogs, so there is a sort of emotional attachment to them. This is probably why when they feel the blog has been verbally threatened or undermined, they must defend it. In my experience, and the experiences of some in our class, the blog minions don’t waste a moment’s time before they strike back. The speed of the blogisphere allows them to respond as quickly as they want, which often leads to very heated comments as there is no cooling off period.
Whatever you want to call them, minions, fanatics, crazy people, the out come is the same: the squashing of any real discussion and debate. This to me is incredibly obnoxious and it makes me hesitate to post a comment on a blog that may not be in complete agreement with the blogger, which totally defeats the purpose of the blogisphere for me. If this cannot be a place of free discussion, the birth of new ides and challenging dialogue, then for me it becomes a place where I can find a good laugh, which is all well and good, but disappointing nonetheless. Considering all the blogisphere could be, it is too bad it has settled to be what it is: a place for like-minded people to virtually pat one another on the back for their like minded ideas.
1- The Frontier (or lack there of).
Unfortunately, as has been the case many times before, when you have a medium with no regulations like the blogisphere, people who participate in it begin to self-regulate. In many areas of the blogisphere, this self regulation has become a web of differing complex rating systems, point scales, and elitist restrictions, thus losing much of the freedom. On some blogs it takes longer to figure out the rules of the site, than it does to read the blog itself. How is this accomplishing anything but more confusion?
Take www.dailykos.com for example. This blog truly angers me. In the frequently asked questions section of this blog, there are 14.6 chapters – each one explaining how to function on the site, which includes everything from how to post a comment to how comments are rated and everything else imaginable. As a blog reader, I want to be able to log online, go to the blogs I am interested in reading and if and when I feel so moved, I want to post a comment. This is not possible on Daily Kos, even after I have read the directions; a blogger must earn the right to comment, earn the right to post something on the blog. Now, Daily Kos is by far the extreme, but it is out there, with all 14.6 chapters of instruction/regulation amongst the most popular political blogs.
Blogs are such a fast paced, cutting edge medium, that they truly are on the frontier of the internet. And this does have some appeal, I don’t want big brother regulating what I can and cannot read, say, or think, but along those same lines, I don’t want Markos Moulitsas Zúniga from Daily Kos regulating me either. I understand a blogger makes the blog, thus he or she makes the rules, but I cannot support a tyrannically constricting blog, such as Daily Kos. Now Heather Armstrong definitely regulates her blog, Dooce, but she does it in what I consider an inoffensive way. Armstrong does not allow comments on her blog, however, you can e-mail her directly with whatever you like. This is definitely a personal choice of hers and a way of regulating both her readers and her blog. And yet I am not offended by it at all, in fact, I love Dooce and I read it nearly daily.
At the end of the day, it is not the regulating of the blogisphere frontier which bothers me, it is the hyper-serious, over-thought, regulation that really pisses me off. It takes all types of people to make a community of any sort, that I understand, but these are blogs, not NASA.
Some Closing Thoughts:
Blogs are among the fastest growing communication mediums of our time. It seems as if everyone is blogging; from preteens to political organizations, to pastors, to retirees and everyone in between, there is a place in the blogisphere for you if you have the patience and the technological means to access it. Only by blogging on myself and experimenting in the blogisphere as both a reader and a blogger, was I able to discover it is not the place for me. I am sure I will continue to dabble on blogs here and there, but not on my own blog and not with any sort of consistency. I have found an appreciation for those people who have found their inner blogger, but as for me, I am ready to blog-off.

